home | email gus | email sarah | email valerie | photos | flickr photos |
|
3.26.2007
Not So Much With The Guilt
If all I'd read was the headline and first paragraph, yes, I'd have felt awful:
Poor Behavior Is Linked to Time in Day Care A much-anticipated report from the largest and longest-running study of American child care has found that keeping a preschooler in a day care center for a year or more increased the likelihood that the child would become disruptive in class — and that the effect persisted through the sixth grade. But then there's that second paragraph, which makes the above... mmm, maybe not so alarming: The effect was slight, and well within the normal range for healthy children, the researchers found. And as expected, parents’ guidance and their genes had by far the strongest influence on how children behaved. Huh, whaddaya know? Later on, more fun with reliability: Others experts were quick to question the results. The researchers could not randomly assign children to one kind of care or another; parents chose the kind of care that suited them. That meant there was no control group, so determining cause and effect was not possible. And some said that measures of day care quality left out important things. No kidding. So, alarm aside, what does this $200 million study ultimately tell us? “What the findings tell me is that we need to pay as much attention to children’s social and emotional development as we do to their cognitive, academic development, especially when they are together in groups,” said Ellen Galinsky, president of the Families and Work Institute, a nonprofit research group. Glad we started the week off right, with an alarmist piece about how kids today are so in trouble that you poor, poor parents better watch your backs. Tomorrow: the New York Times publishes the findings of its four-year-long investigative journalism series, in partnership with the Foundation for the Study of Aquaticism, entitled WATER: IT'S WET. (via The New Republic) Labels: alarmist, daycare, journalism, kids 3.15.2007
Flips That Aren't Flops
Former SPINSANITY contributor Brendan Nyhan points out a very good essay from Jon Chait [registration required; use bugmenot] regarding the arbitrariness of defining politicians by "flip-flops", and makes a few good points on the subject on his own.
Labels: character, journalism, politics
|
|