here�s what happens when this irresponsible congress railroads a profoundly important bill to serve the mindless politics of a midterm election: the bush administration uses republicans� fear of losing their majority to push through ghastly ideas about antiterrorism that will make american troops less safe and do lasting damage to our 217-year-old nation of laws � while actually doing nothing to protect the nation from terrorists. democrats betray their principles to avoid last-minute attack ads. our democracy is the big loser.

...there is not enough time to fix these bills, especially since the few republicans who call themselves moderates have been whipped into line, and the democratic leadership in the senate seems to have misplaced its spine. if there was ever a moment for a filibuster, this was it.

we don�t blame the democrats for being frightened. the republicans have made it clear that they�ll use any opportunity to brand anyone who votes against this bill as a terrorist enabler. but americans of the future won�t remember the pragmatic arguments for caving in to the administration.

they�ll know that in 2006, congress passed a tyrannical law that will be ranked with the low points in american democracy, our generation�s version of the alien and sedition acts.

more than a third of the american public suspects that federal officials assisted in the 9/11 terrorist attacks or took no action to stop them so the united states could go to war in the middle east, according to a new scripps howard/ohio university poll.

the national survey of 1,010 adults also found that anger against the federal government is at record levels, with 54 percent saying they "personally are more angry" at the government than they used to be.

widespread resentment and alienation toward the national government appears to be fueling a growing acceptance of conspiracy theories about the 2001 attacks on the world trade center and the pentagon.

suspicions that the 9/11 attacks were "an inside job" _ the common phrase used by conspiracy theorists on the internet _ quickly have become nearly as popular as decades-old conspiracy theories that the federal government was responsible for president john f. kennedy's assassination and that it has covered up proof of space aliens.

seventy percent of people who give credence to these theories also say they've become angrier with the federal government than they used to be.

thirty-six percent of respondents overall said it is "very likely" or "somewhat likely" that federal officials either participated in the attacks on the world trade center and the pentagon or took no action to stop them "because they wanted the united states to go to war in the middle east."

people have taken me to task for the tone of my irwin post, fine. but andy's one-line link to the news had a tagline that's haunted me all day: "died doing what he loved." it's a statement, rationale, explanation that's meant, i guess, to help make sense of an otherwise senseless, random event.

i wanted to type 'accident,' but the whole point is that it's not referring to some banal everyday activity like crossing the street or a sudden illness like stage 2 pancreatic cancer, or even something stupidly avoidable like standing under a tree in a lightning storm. beyond the basics, though, we regularly put ourselves at varying degrees of risk doing "what we love" whether that's our jobs, our hobbies, our compulsions, or our passions. and when that risk-reward calculation goes south, it's not just we who pay the price, it's our families.