home | email gus | email sarah | email valerie | photos | flickr photos
blogs
comics
music
stuff

2.28.2005
Old Towne



AZ Blue Skies



Val, working



Tom Brokaw at the MCAA convention, Scottsdale, AZ



2.24.2005
You're such a freaking ASHCROFT

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA:
"...some airline passengers watching the Oscar-nominated film "Sideways" on foreign flights are, in fact, hearing "Ashcroft" as a substitute for a certain seven-letter epithet commonly used to denote a human orifice.

The Post's Monte Reel, based in Buenos Aires, tells us he heard the former attorney general's name substituted at least twice in "Sideways" dialogue when he watched the film earlier this week on an Aerolineas Argentinas flight to Lima, Peru. The movie was shown in English and the dubbing was done "in the actual voices of the actors," Reel reports. Star Thomas Haden Church utters the A-word."
More from today's Reliable Source column in the Washington Post.



2.23.2005
An Elegant Weapon of a More Civilized Age

Oh, wow. Here's a step-by-step tutorial on how to rotoscope lightsaber effects into your own home movies -- i.e., MAKE YOUR OWN JEDI SWORDFIGHT.




...you have NO IDEA how badly I want to try this.



2.22.2005
My Moral Dilemma



So when I heard a Dukes of Hazzard MOVIE was coming out I called Gus to ask why he hadn't told me (because he didn't know - Yes for once, I scooped him!) and then I immediately called Valerie (T.O.O.) to talk to the only other person in the world who would actually be excited with me. (we were both avid viewers in our youth and during the days of the Crazy Valeries)

Then while following another link I found this bit of bad news courtesy of moviehole.com:

Schneider loathes Dukes of Hazzard redo

Look out Stifler, duck for cover Jackass, disguise yourself in a tin of 'Chicken of the Sea' Simpson......the original "Duke" is out to get ya.

John Schneider, one of the original 'Good ol Boys', tells IESB that if he's asked to cameo in the new "Dukes of Hazzard movie" - starring the aforesaid Sean William Scott, Johnny Knoxville and Jessica Simpson - he'll give the offer the birdie. "I wouldn't drive into that movie even with your car", the "Smallville" actor says.

According to the site, Schneider isn't happy that the movie is going to be a spoof of the old Television series.
Now what am I supposed to do? Who wants a blonde Daisy? But Willie Nelson as Uncle Jesse? How can you pass that up. And Burt, Burt Reynolds as Boss Hog. Good gravy!

So do I listen to the love of my life (TV life, Dahlberg) and shun the film or do I go and bask in the glory of a gigantic General Lee???




2.21.2005
Blood in the Water

Now, this made me laugh (this all comes via Josh Marshall, who has his own dog and viewpoint in the Social Security hunt, but never mind that now, what we're focusing on is the Keystone Cops-ishness of this small portion of the fight):

Here's an ad currently being featured on the website of the very conservative AMERICAN SPECTATOR (I've saved a copy straight from there and am now hosting it here in all of its unglory):



Very classy, yes?

Which links to these folks here -- who, as they are apparently cheerfully acknowledging, are the second incarnation of the SwiftVets (and, some might say, their "slimy" tactics.)

But it's not even that part that kills me. It's this: AARP="liberal"? What planet are these people on, anyway? Apart from this particular Social Security issue, aren't these guys generally on the same side? And isn't that side a rather more conservative one?

Dad's right -- it's mutally assured destruction in politics, anymore -- demonize and dehumanize your opponent without regard to later consequences for the sake of your goal. Sheesh.



Don't Be A Do-Badder

The next Rat Pack Remake by the Clooney/Pitt/Damon crew?

1964's ROBIN AND THE 7 HOODS.

[via kottke]



2.18.2005
blogsblogsblogsandmoreblogs

THE DAILY SHOW's Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert on blogs, journalism, and the intertwining/navel-gazing of the two:

JON: Ted, you're sort of 'old media,' you're an old media reporter. What are your thoughts on, in your mind, the role of these new media figures?

STEPHEN: Jon, the vast majority of bloggers out there are responsible correspondents doing fine work in niche reporting fields like Gilmore Girl fan fiction, or cute things their cats do or photoshopped images of the Gilmore Girls as cats. That's great. Where I draw the line is with these "attack bloggers," just someone with a computer who gathers, collates and publishes accurate information that is then read by the general public. They have no credibility. All they have is facts. Spare me...


[via waxy]



Maher gets real

I've never been a huge fan of Bill Maher's. Once he started moving away from comedy and closer to politics, he seemed to annoy me much more frequently than he made me laugh. But in this op-ed in today's LA Times, his politics are hard to disagree with. A man after my own heart, he lashes out at the teens who were part of the recent survey that showed a shameful lack of understanding of the First Amendment. Sez Bill:
"And what's so frightening is that we're seeing the beginnings of the first post-9/11 generation — the kids who first became aware of the news under an "Americans need to watch what they say" administration, the kids who've been told that dissent is un-American and therefore justifiably punished by a fine, imprisonment — or the loss of your show on ABC."
Lame jokes aside (and I admit there are several in this article) I agree with the man.



2.17.2005
All hell's 'a comin'



Softball

Frank Rich in the New York Times with a quieter take on "Jeff Gannon" and fake news:

On "Countdown," a nightly news hour on MSNBC, the anchor, Keith Olbermann, led off with a classic "Daily Show"-style bit: a rapid-fire montage of sharply edited video bites illustrating the apparent idiocy of those in Washington. In this case, the eight clips stretched over a year in the White House briefing room - from February 2004 to late last month - and all featured a reporter named "Jeff." In most of them, the White House press secretary, Scott McClellan, says "Go ahead, Jeff," and "Jeff" responds with a softball question intended not to elicit information but to boost President Bush and smear his political opponents. In the last clip, "Jeff" is quizzing the president himself, in his first post-inaugural press conference of Jan. 26. Referring to Harry Reid and Hillary Clinton, "Jeff" asks, "How are you going to work with people who seem to have divorced themselves from reality?"

If we did not live in a time when the news culture itself is divorced from reality, the story might end there: "Jeff," you'd assume, was a lapdog reporter from a legitimate, if right-wing, news organization like Fox, and you'd get some predictable yuks from watching a compressed video anthology of his kissing up to power. But as Mr. Olbermann explained, "Jeff Gannon," the star of the montage, was a newsman no more real than a "Senior White House Correspondent" like Stephen Colbert on "The Daily Show" and he worked for a news organization no more real than The Onion. Yet the video broadcast by Mr. Olbermann was not fake. "Jeff" was in the real White House, and he did have those exchanges with the real Mr. McClellan and the real Mr. Bush.

"Jeff Gannon's" real name is James D. Guckert. His employer was a Web site called Talon News, staffed mostly by volunteer Republican activists. Media Matters for America, the liberal press monitor that has done the most exhaustive research into the case, discovered that Talon's "news" often consists of recycled Republican National Committee and White House press releases, and its content frequently overlaps with another partisan site, GOPUSA, with which it shares its owner, a Texas delegate to the 2000 Republican convention. Nonetheless, for nearly two years the White House press office had credentialed Mr. Guckert, even though, as Dana Milbank of The Washington Post explained on Mr. Olbermann's show, he "was representing a phony media company that doesn't really have any such thing as circulation or readership."

How this happened is a mystery that has yet to be solved. "Jeff" has now quit Talon News not because he and it have been exposed as fakes but because of other embarrassing blogosphere revelations linking him to sites like hotmilitarystud.com and to an apparently promising career as an X-rated $200-per-hour "escort." If Mr. Guckert, the author of Talon News exclusives like "Kerry Could Become First Gay President," is yet another link in the boundless network of homophobic Republican closet cases, that's not without interest. But it shouldn't distract from the real question - that is, the real news - of how this fake newsman might be connected to a White House propaganda machine that grows curiouser by the day. Though Mr. McClellan told Editor & Publisher magazine that he didn't know until recently that Mr. Guckert was using an alias, Bruce Bartlett, a White House veteran of the Reagan-Bush I era, wrote on the nonpartisan journalism Web site Romenesko, that "if Gannon was using an alias, the White House staff had to be involved in maintaining his cover." (Otherwise, it would be a rather amazing post-9/11 security breach.)

[more] (registration required; use bugmenot)



2.16.2005
Things That Aren't Really Paintings Or Sculptures

Peej sent me this:

NEW YORK (CNN/Money) - Two "Dogs Playing Poker" paintings cleaned house at Doyle New York's annual Dogs in Art Auction, fetching a staggering $590,400, the auction house said.

It was estimated that the two rare paintings from Cassius Marcellus Coolidge's 1903 series of dogs playing poker would fetch $30,000-$50,000, Doyle said in a statement after Tuesday's sale. The auction house said that, after intense bidding, "A Bold Bluff" and "Waterloo: Two" sold to a private collector from New York City.

"The (paintings') sequential narrative follows the same 'players' in the course of a hand of poker," said an auction note from Doyle. "In the first, our main character, the St. Bernard, holds a weak hand as the rest of the crew maintains their best poker faces. In the following scene, we see the St. Bernard raking in the large pot, much to the very obvious dismay of his fellow players."

[more]



2.15.2005
Lukens



2.14.2005
My Funny Valentine

Below is Carl's Valentines Day comment on the many faces of LOVE...

Awestruck



Joy



Regret




2.12.2005
Ready for a walk



Gus, Carl and I took advantage of a beautiful Saturday to get out a little and explore our High Street business district on foot, but he was so cute, we just needed a quick photo session first.



2.11.2005
We love Swedish furniture

Now, I like Ikea as much as anybody else, but rioting to get your hands on a cheap sofa? I guess it was just too hard for London shoppers to turn down the promises of lower than usual prices at the new store opening:
"Video footage showed shoppers fighting over furniture - one man was pinned against a wall by a burly customer as they argued over a sofa - while others were stretchered into ambulances.

After 30 minutes the store was closed, staff holding up signs written in marker pen against the glass doors to announce the fact. The crowd refused to disperse and some tried to smash their way in.

More than 30 police tried to keep the peace amid fights between Ikea staff and shoppers. Firefighters freed trapped customers. Assistant Divisional Officer William Bird said: "I have not attended anything like this before." Traffic on the A406 seized up as people stuck in jams for more than an hour abandoned their cars."
And I thought holiday shopping was bad. Wow.



2.07.2005
OSU an outstanding example?

An op-ed in Saturday's Post caught my attention--it focused on how a culture of drinking is damaging sports, both professional and collegiate.

Toward the end of the article, the author explains what he thinks is one solution:
"A few basic reforms could help end the devastating consequences of combining sports and intoxication. Professional sports leagues, teams, stadiums, colleges and vendors need to review and reform their alcohol policies. Limiting tailgate parties, prohibiting open containers, restricting the amount of alcohol sold to a single customer, training staff to recognize signs of intoxication, and monitoring staff and customer behavior are among the reforms needed. Some colleges ban alcohol altogether at sporting events. Why should college football be saturated with beer advertising and drunken behavior? Ohio State provides a sensible approach to the problem."
I wasn't sure about this, so I thought I'd throw it back to the Ohio posse. Does Ohio State no longer sell beer at games? Certainly they don't have limits on tailgate parties--having been an attendee myself at some over the years, I didn't see any kind of enforcement or limitations. And hasn't Ohio State had some problem with unruly behavior by students after games that has been associated with heavy drinking?



A Rebuttal

I know I've been off on a rampage about the teaching of "Intelligent Design." But here's a piece from the New York Times that explains more about the theory and argues that it isn't a religion-motivated theory:
"Intelligent design proponents do question whether random mutation and natural selection completely explain the deep structure of life. But they do not doubt that evolution occurred. And intelligent design itself says nothing about the religious concept of a creator."
It's nice to see this theory laid out with a bit more detail, and I am cheered to see that it is something that is being discussed by the scientific community. But it still alarms me that we're hesitating to teach children evolution and that some religious zealots are using this theory as a way to alter school curriculum.

And scientific theory or no, I'm still putting it in quotes. So there.



2.04.2005
Choco-aficionado Report - "It Tastes Better Sweet"



I love chocolate, dark, milk, white, hot, cold, frozen, chocolate.

Everyone knows it. My son can say a dozen words. One of them is cocoa.

So I had to try Starbucks new "sipping chocolate" to see if it was up to all the hype.

It is. It TOTALLY is. It is like drinking brownie batter. It is the perfect blend of dark chocolate bite with the right amount of sweet. Mine was the perfect temperature for hot chocolate and the perfect consistency. Best chocolate experience since my first taste of Godiva in high school.

Deeeeelicious



Another State

Putting this one up because of my occupational interest:

NY's same-sex marriage ban struck down

A Manhattan judge declared Friday that the section of state law that forbids same-sex marriage is unconstitutional -- the first ruling of its kind in New York and one that if upheld on appeal would allow gay couples to wed.

State Supreme Court Justice Doris Ling-Cohan ruled that the words "husband," "wife," "groom" and "bride" in relevant sections of the Domestic Relations Law "shall be construed to mean 'spouse,"' and "all personal pronouns ... shall be construed to apply equally to either men or women." Ling-Cohan ruled on the side of five same-sex couples who were denied marriage licenses. She said the New York City clerk could not deny a license to any couple solely on the ground that the two are of the same sex.

[more]

I should note that this is a decision from New York City's trial court level, and that there's the state court of appeals and the New York state Supreme Court ahead of the case, obviously.

But interesting, nonetheless.



80 Percent? Heaven Forbid!

(As mail2blogger appears to not want to post my email from Monday morning, I guess I'll have to do it the old fashioned way:)

Legislation that would restrict what university professors could say in their classrooms was introduced yesterday in Ohio.

Judging from reactions in other states where similar bills have been considered, controversy won’t be far behind.

Marion Sen. Larry A. Mumper’s "academic bill of rights for higher education" would prohibit instructors at public or private universities from "persistently" discussing controversial issues in class or from using their classes to push political, ideological, religious or anti-religious views.

Senate Bill 24 also would prohibit professors from discriminating against students based on their beliefs and keep universities from hiring, firing, promoting or giving tenure to instructors based on their beliefs.

Mumper, a Republican, said many professors undermine the values of their students because "80 percent or so of them (professors) are Democrats, liberals or socialists or card-carrying Communists" who attempt to indoctrinate students.

"These are young minds that haven’t had a chance to form their own opinions," Mumper said. "Our colleges and universities are still filled with some of the ’60s and ’70s profs that were the anti-American group. They’ve gotten control of how to give people tenure and so the colleges continue to move in this direction."

### - [full story from the Dispatch]

Posted because I find this... well, hilarious wouldn't be that far wrong. Do I think it's remotely likely to pass? Nope. Do I think it's representative of the Republican party in general? Nope. But am I shocked that that's where it's coming from?

Nope.

[via people have the power]



2.02.2005
Standing O

I just wanna know... who decides when the dems stand and clap during the State of the Union? Is there someone in the front row giving signals?



She'll Make Point Five Past Lightspeed

Someone took their Xbox and built it into a model of the Millennium Falcon:



And they're selling it on ebay.co.uk.




2.01.2005
WHAT are we teaching them?!

Two disturbing stories on education today.

The first, continuing a theme that royally chaps my ass, on how evolution is under assault in the classroom. In this piece, the assault is not from our "Intelligent Design" friends, but from teachers themselves who have been intimidated into not disucssing evolution in the classroom. A disturbing quote:
Dr. Eugenie Scott, executive director of the National Center for Science Education, said she heard "all the time" from teachers who did not teach evolution "because it's just too much trouble."

"Or their principals tell them, 'We just don't have time to teach everything so let's leave out the things that will cause us problems,' " she said.
The second, and equally anxiety-inducing, deals with how students today view the First Amendment. According to AP's Ben Feller, students just don't give our Constitution the same kind of respect it has always inspired:
...when told of the exact text of the First Amendment, more than one in three high school students said it goes "too far" in the rights it guarantees. Only half of the students said newspapers should be allowed to publish freely without government approval of stories.
What?!? What in high heaven are we teaching our students? That we can't and don't trust science and research? That the Constitution of the United States and the freedoms it guarantees are bunk? That the government has a right to tell people what to do, say, and think?

I don't know about you, but I'm frightened. In 30 years, these are the people that will be running the country. And if this country turns out like 1984, I think I might have to relocate to the moon.



Donald



www.flickr.com
amazon wishlist
Weblog Commenting by HaloScan.comThis page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?Moblogging by Mfop2