![]() |
![]() |
| home | email gus | email sarah | email valerie | photos | flickr photos |
|
1.28.2005
what really happened
ad agency ddb has created yet another great ad... but since it won't hit airwaves, you'll have to go to the budweiser site to see it (if you haven't already).
it's the story of what was really behind the "wardrobe malfunction" at last year's super bowl. har, har. 1.27.2005
spamusement
found by the boys over at panel: spamusement! poorly-drawn cartoons inspired by actual spam subject lines!
i particularly like "i can propose you the optimum select software," "you won't believe what you can get for a buck," and "an email from god." 1.26.2005
nobody does it better
annuals
jeremy points out his list of annuals, those movies that cry out -- nay, demand -- a ritualized, repeat viewing at least once a year. and as i pointed out in the comments that i pin a good chunk of the blame for at least some of my particular annuals on his shoulders, i started to think about what those annuals might be.
in no particular order: sneakers searching for bobby fischer prince of darkness the thing exorcist iii overboard blazing saddles the hunt for red october superman el dorado the abyss north by northwest event horizon the american president i'm sure i'll think of more later, but those are the most obvious ones, the ones that find their way into my dvd player year after year or get tivoed whenever they're on the boob tube (excepting only overboard, which somehow always finds me and sucks me in. that movie is like gum on your shoe: once on, it follows you around and never comes off...) there are certainly others, tied to holidays (such as a christmas story), but i decided that only the halloween flicks merited repeat viewings in their own right, so they're on while others are off. and i almost put a few good men on there, over the american president, but for some reason i gravitate more towards the beta version of the west wing than i do the legal tomfoolery of smiling jack ross... you? 1.25.2005
here are the nominees...
actor in a leading role
don cheadle - hotel rwanda johnny depp - finding neverland leonardo dicaprio - the aviator clint eastwood - million dollar baby jamie foxx - ray actor in a supporting role alan alda - the aviator thomas haden church - sideways jamie foxx - collateral morgan freeman - million dollar baby clive owen - closer actress in a leading role annette bening - being julia catalina sandino moreno - maria full of grace imelda staunton - vera drake hilary swank - million dollar baby kate winslet - eternal sunshine of the spotless mind actress in a supporting role cate blanchett - the aviator laura linney - kinsey virginia madsen - sideways sophie okonedo - hotel rwanda natalie portman - closer writing (adapted screenplay) richard linklater et al. - before sunset david magee - finding neverland paul haggis - million dollar baby jose rivera - the motorcycle diaries alexander payne and jim taylor - sideways writing (original screenplay) john logan - the aviator charlie kaufman - eternal sunshine of the spotless mind keir pearson & terry george - hotel rwanda brad bird - the incredibles mike leigh - vera drake directing martin scorcese - the aviator clint eastwood - million dollar baby taylor hackford - ray alexander payne - sideways mike leigh - vera drake best picture the aviator finding neverland million dollar baby ray sideways ### huh. i am so completely out of the loop, i've managed to see none of those. not one. (amusing to see jamie foxx competing in both actor categories -- having won the globe, is that a good sign for a best actor oscar?) but i guess the short answer is, if i have even one prayer of competing in our little ballot contest this year, it's time for me to head to the theater... complete nominee list here. videonow
your friend and mine: google now has a video search (beta search of closed caption text available online -- no actual video yet, but how much do you want to bet that's in the works as more and more video is made available online?)
i think i prefer the bunny
so i was thinking, why worry about keeping the vacuum in the closet when we can just cover it up? [via boingboing] 1.24.2005
unitelligent designs on education
"intelligent design" seems to be the buzzword du jour.
this makes me angry. very angry. terrified that suddenly, we could be teaching our children science using theories and ideas that aren't based in any kind of science. frankly, religious education is the place to teach these ideas, not the same classes that dissect amphibians and learn the basic principles of chemistry. science is--and always has been--grounded in research, in discovery, in experimentation. in theory, yes, but theories that just so happen to have a lot of evidence that makes them credible. religion doesn't belong in that classroom. period. ed. to add: thought i'd add a quote from the time piece that sums up how i feel about this. "[intelligent design] appalls the many scientists and science teachers who believe in evolution and also believe in god. 'i accept evolution as the best scientific explanation for life as we know it,' says jeremy mohn, a self-described "very religious" methodist who teaches biology at blue valley northwest high school, just a few minutes' drive from bingman's school. 'i also believe that god is ultimately responsible for the process. but it's not our job to dust for fingerprints.'" 1.21.2005
v for v
buy nothing yesterday
mark frauenfelder at boingboing points out author mark dery's hilariously over-the-top yet absolutely dead-on rant on "not one more damn dime day", the "economic boycott" intended to "protest" yesterday's presidential inauguration. awesome.
preach it
the catholic church defrocked the irish-born priest who upset the men's olympic marathon in athens last summer by leaping on the front-runner.
...earlier horan arrived at the archbishop's house armed with press releases and a mini tape recorder. before going into the meeting he performed an irish jig and preached the importance of the bible. horan was given a one-year suspended sentence by a greek court last september after leaping on brazilian runner vanderli de lima during the marathon, ruining his chances of winning the gold medal. the roman catholic priest claimed that he was highlighting the "second coming" of jesus christ. [via warren] 1.20.2005
best face forward
outgoing deputy secretary of state richard armitage, in an interview with the australian, on his reflections and thoughts about the ups and downs of the last four years:
and armitage's disappointments? not a lugubrious person, armitage doesn't nominate disappointments spontaneously. but he'll answer a question honestly: "i'm disappointed that iraq hasn't turned out better. and that we weren't able to move forward more meaningfully in the middle east peace process." that's probably the best summation of the last three years that anyone has ever made. [via kevin drum] 1.19.2005
the great housing disappearing act
isn't about time for the bubble to burst??
an article in today's washington post tells us that property values in my beloved arlington have gone up yet again. up by 24 percent, in fact, in just one year. looking across the last three years puts the jump at a whopping 70 percent increase. 70 percent?!? that's nuts!! of course, we've all known this was happening. i live in a small, two-bedroom, one-bathroom rowhouse with an unfinished basement. all the houses in my neighborhood are identical in layout to mine (although some have finished basements with an extra bath). in the five years i've lived here, i've seen the resale value of these little boogers shoot up from around $200,000 to nearly $400,000! i couldn't even afford to buy the front yard if i tried. all i can say is, thank god i did not try to buy a place, because i'd probably be living either in bfe or a slum in the city right now. honestly, i don't understand how people are affording these insane housing prices. another trend i've noticed in arlington is the practice of destroy & build. instead of fixing up or remodeling older houses, buyers are instead tearing them down completely and building new-fangled, gigundous homes. i might understand this a little better if there were structural flaws in the homes. sometimes, it can be less expensive to build anew rather than to fix and add-on. however, i can't imagine this is the case in all these new homes. is this just a dc bubble, or is this happening back in the homestead as well? 1.17.2005
accountability
oh, you thought that now that the election's over, you can forget all about all that crazy stuff we talked about for months on end? well, good news, then: your president does, too:
president bush said the public's decision to reelect him was a ratification of his approach toward iraq and that there was no reason to hold any administration officials accountable for mistakes or misjudgments in prewar planning or managing the violent aftermath. "an accountability moment"? i can't believe that i actually read that. no, more -- i can't believe that a man who sits in the highest office in this country would be flippant enough to say that out loud, in public and unironically. "an accountability moment"!? as if re-electing the president not only validated his policies but absolved both he and his administration from responsibility for any mistakes or misjudgments? a reverse-presidential pardon? here's a transcript of the interview itself (wapo registration probably required, i was already signed in so i don't know for sure.) read it. this isn't a case where his answers were taken out of context -- the question was put to him directly, why hasn't anyone been held accountable for mistakes in prewar planning and postwar operations? because of "an accountability moment." unambiguous, flat out, unironic and direct. because america voted for me. i'm not so blind-left that i think president bush is really dr. evil in disguise, but this refusal to acknowledge 1) that mistakes or misjudgments in pre- and post-war planning exist (such as, ferinstance, that no weapons of mass destruction were ever found in iraq) and 2) that the 2004 election wasn't a yea-or-nay vote on his policies but a choice between two deeply flawed candidates in an unstable wartime environment, is deeply, deeply troubling. (never mind my quibbles with the rest of his comments, in which he reveals that the constitutional amendment banning gay marriage, which he trumpeted throughout the campaign and used like a bludgeon against his wishy-washy opponent, is dead and has no support from the white house -- a ghost, a campaign tactic that was all about pandering to the right and scaring the center, imho.) call it just extraordinary confidence in his own choices if you must (and some no doubt have and will), but it strikes me as overconfidence, bordering on unthinking arrogance. and that, to me, spells trouble in the next four years -- because if nobody's worth holding accountable for what's happened to date, who is? where's the line? where does the buck stop? because i don't think it's in this white house. 1.16.2005
signing out
so friday carl's daycare teachers reported that he had a whopping two servings of hamburger for lunch. we were impressed with his appetite, but thought little else of it. gus's son eating a lot of meat is certainly not news to anyone. then saturday carl starts making this hand signal every time he wants something we're eating coupled with something sounding much like the word "more". impressed with his verbal ability we give him whatever he's asked for (as we are wont to do) and went on thinking his vocabulary was really coming along. then by sunday the hand gesture was more than we could brush off. he did it every time. tapping his little fingers together and staring intently at his nearly empty plate. so i did a little looking into it and it seems our boy has picked up more than just a verbal vocabulary, he's started to sign. maybe that daycare investment is worth it afterall. can't wait until tomorrow morning to talk to his teachers and see what else he might be trying to tell us. amazing! 1.14.2005
boo boo
there we were, playing happily as a family, doing what every american family does: family wrestling. and then my son, the thirteen-month-old hulk hogan, headbutted valerie -- smack! -- square on, no holds barred, right in the nose. thus and so, the boo boo beartm being applied to the slightly swollen bridge of my lovely wife's nose, above. no black eyes, and the swelling appears to have gone down, so we don't think it's broken, thank god, though val swears she heard something give a squicking crunch inside her sinuses. and yet carl shows no ill effects, no crying, not a scratch on him. hell, he laughed. (so did i, kind of. come on! how can you not?) but yes, ha ha. funny now, until you realize that if he does it to us, he's probably gonna do it to some poor unsuspecting toddler at the daycare, and then we're going to get that special call from the daycare director to come in and talk about carl's little problem and how we're going to appease the parents of the kid what got his nose broke. 1.13.2005
grrrrrr.
sure glad to see that emails i sent to blogger on monday are showing up today. that's a nice turnaround time for the api.
/snark mike tee vee would love it
1.12.2005
gerald an urgent message f0r you
not all spam is worthless, as it turns out. sometimes, it unspools into the greatest unsolicited commerical love story you've ever read.
just put an "i" in front of it, we'll sell a million of 'em
larry somehow got a hold of apple's newest pr campaign before anyone else.
...i still think their new monitor- and keyboard-less macmini looks cool, though:
but yeah. that's funny. weird
1.10.2005
weak
got off my lazy butt yesterday and went to see a movie i had been dying to see--"sideways." i mean, a movie made over a backdrop of wine tasting? (but not, as gus insisted to me, a movie about wine!) should have been a dream movie!
i say "should have" because it fell far, far short of my expectations. though i thought paul giamatti and thomas haden church both give great performances, the story left me feeling, i don't know, bored? disinterested? not giving a rat's a$$ about what happened to the characters? sure, i was rooting for giamatti's character to snap out of his funk, even though you know his low self esteem can probably never recover. and i hated church's womanizing, deceptive, b-list actor. but i didn't feel strongly enough about either to really care how it all ended up. apparently, i'm not alone in my disappointment: a.o. scott in the new york times this weekend dubbed the movie "the most overrated film of the year." at least one scene, however, really drew me in: virginia madsen's soulful character gives a monologue about why she loves wine; it's enough to make anyone look at their next bottle just a little differently. but the moment is short and fleeting, nipped by more attention to the schlubby main character, miles, and his insecurities. my advice? wait for the dvd. bright lights, big city
my pal xtop plays his first piano recital:
i never have dreams about showing up naked to school or sitting down for a test and realizing i forgot to study for it. my anxiety dreams tend to revolve around haunted houses, falling and losing things. so i�m confused, sitting up here on stage in front of a piano, my hands shaking like blurry exposures and the songs i�d spent all week practicing suddenly gone, inaccessible, while 20 strangers, my teacher and matt & kelly sue stared up at me in expectant horror. i start to play, and then i hit a wrong note. �wait. let me start again.� i know i know how to play musette; i�ve been playing it for two goddamn months now. this is ridiculous. but eventually i give up; i go on to the next song. same thing, same wreckage of bad rhythm and forgotten notes. i can feel sweat building up, that same flop sweat that comes on during lessons, but this is so much worse. i am able to just barely play sleeping beauty waltz by tchaikovsky and everyone applauds, mostly out of pity, it seems. i bow as instructed and walk back to my pew and sink down. i�ve just had my ass handed to me by a 7-year old girl in a black dress. tell me this is a nightmare. more at thoughtpeach. lights out
goal: have power to all by midnight
mansfield -- ohio edison estimates 5,000 to 6,000 residents remained in the dark sunday evening, but all power should be restored by midnight tonight. "we have a lot of crews out tonight," company spokesman kirk gardner said. "i'm very hopeful we'll be at full restoration by midnight." at the peak of the winter ice storm, ohio edison had 50,000 to 60,000 residents without power. since then, gardner said, crews have come from far and wide to assist, including from pittsburgh, kentucky and maryland. ...american electric power spokeswoman suzanne priore said everyone in bellville and lexington should have power restored. those who do not should call aep at (800) 672-2231. the company will continue to work on problems in that area, she said. near willard, nearly 4,000 people remain in the dark. most should have power by midnight tuesday. isolated areas may take until midnight thursday to have power restored. ### ontario and galion weren't included in that "restored by midnight" jazz, i guess -- mom and dad have been without power since late wednesday night. they're camped out at chez dahlberg (columbus) now, enjoying some extra stolen time with carl. val and i are having a hard time with the thought that at some point, ohioed/first energy and aep will get their acts together and we'll lose our four-to-one advantage over the boy. but wow, five days, no power (and, to my dad's eternal chagrin, a partially flooded basement -- since the pump that would normally shunt the groundwater away from the basement isn't working without juice...) ohioed/first energy's not really having a good couple of years, are they? 1.07.2005
blurry lines
i'm often the first to jump out and defend public relations tactics--such as video news releases and other common practices. but this headline in today's usa today led to some serious eyebrow raising:
white house paid commentator to promote lawnow, i'm not going to rush to immediate judgment here, especially because this was a client of my former employer. i know the people who ran these accounts and handled these clients; they are among some of the most ethical and professional pr folks out there. i believe there simply has to be more here that mr. toppo hasn't explained or uncovered, or that his slant and quest to uncover "dirt" is muddying a legitimate deal. (i find particularly offensive in this piece mr. toppo's insistence on placing the phrase video news release in quotation marks. this is, after all, a common pr practice and not limited to government organizations. they are no different from news releases; it is the editor of the station's responsibility to use the material in the way that best serves the public.) but i do have to wonder if maybe, as pr folks, we're blurring the lines too much. are there spokespeople we should avoid? relationships that do more harm than good? when is spin unacceptable? favors? networking? coalition-building? i think as practitioners, we often assume that more spin is better, since we typically believe and understand that good editors will detect our agendas. when our "talking points" break through this filter, we celebrate a victory. we claim it isn't our job to seek balance, it's our job to promote. but do we overstep boundaries in our quest to get our message through the clutter? the wapo also has a story in the a section this morning about another "fake news" report (i.e., video news release). this time, it's the drug control office that issued the offending video. this time, the post acknowledges that stations receiving the package "knew the materials were produced by the office of national drug control policy." but did the office cross a line? does the fact that the actor claims he is "reporting" at the end of the segment make the piece propaganda? if he simply signed off with his name, would that be any different? i don't know the answers. but i know these are issues that my industry will struggle with for the next few years. 1.06.2005
house of card
from yesterday's washington post--an intriguing piece about white house chief of staff, andrew card.
i have to admit, i don't know much about the man; this article is the first time i've ever read a profile of him. but what they reveal is fascinating, particularly the details about his mnemonic memory trick for keeping facts and details in order. a handy trick i think i could certainly make good use of! wonder where one can take a class on such things?? 1.05.2005
passing of a giant
will eisner died this week.
here's a sample of his work, a single page from one of his invaluable process books that doesn't even begin to demonstrate how important or influential he was on american comic books over the course of his sixty-plus years in the industry. not, perhaps, to the same must-imitate-him degree of jack kirby, but certainly in an age when we're talking about standalone graphic novels as the viable future of the american medium, eisner was there first, and he's been doing it for decades. his stuff is required reading, no question. hell of a way to start 2005. statue
snow
new year's
virgil brigman back on the air
![]() and we're back. boy howdy, that was a month, wasn't it? folks are engaged, folks are pregnant, folks are changing jobs (none of the above applies to present company, mind, but my friends have been a font of change over the last thirty days or so...) holidays come and gone with the whitest christmas on record (and a twelve-hour power outage, to boot) only to yield the wettest new year in recent memory -- it's raining as i type this, cold and gloomy and miserable. where'd my snow go? i mean, if it's gonna be cold in january, it could at least have the decency to give me something fun to play in outside with carl. sarah's been keeping the home fires burning here, as i see, but expect otherwise regular updates from columbus to recommence soonish. i think we've got a nice backlog of about four months' worth of pictures to sort through and post up, for all of you who can't quite get enough of my mad shutterbug skillz. and i may finally tackle that whole digital video for public consumption thing -- who knows? be excellent to one another, and happy new year to ya. 1.03.2005
best of '04
i just read a "best of" column that i thought i should share with you all: david edelstein of slate.com's review of the 13 best movies of 2004. why 13? i'm not really sure, but he includes some great flicks on there.
most notably, he lists eternal sunshine of the spotless mind as his number one pick of the year. i couldn't agree more. i didn't get to see this movie until a few weeks ago, when my friends rented it for a girls' night in. even though i'm prone to bouts of napping at movies in (particularly ones started after 10 p.m.), i stayed awake throughout the entire movie. at one point, my friend jaymie even suspiciously asked, "sarah, are you asleep?" when she hadn't seen me stir for about 20 minutes. the truth was, i was mesmerized by the film. and i really love edelstein's analysis of the movie: in the greatest remarriage comedies, enduring romantic happiness is only possible by falling in and out of love with the same person�your true love often being difficult to live with yet impossible to forget. but by forcing yourself to forget�sometimes just to go on living�you lose a part of your soul. kaufman made the memory purge literal and the process by which the memories leak back into the psyche literal, too.... michel gondry brings all his delirious visual imagination to bear on this precarious lover's mindscape, and the performances are heartbreaking�jim carrey the straightjacketed clown, kate winslet the rash, unstable, desperately unhappy romantic. if you didn't get it, see it again. if you didn't like it, i am so, so sorry�for us both.if you haven't seen it yet, rent it. it's so worth it. other movies i liked in 2004? maria full of grace. i've never been one for subtitled movies, but this film was stunning and incredibly moving. napoleon dynamite. anyone who has ever felt "outside of the mainstream" or been accused of being, well, a dork, must see this movie. 21 grams. although the sequence of events in the movie can be disconcerting, all of the actors deliver powerful performances. garden state. zach braff's directorial (and writing) debut was heartfelt and genuine. (but then i heart braff anyway.) anchorman. i haven't laughed that heartily at a movie in ages. ron burgundy is priceless. anyone else?
|
|
|
||