![]() |
![]() |
| home | email gus | email sarah | email valerie | photos | flickr photos |
|
10.29.2004
Battle of the Bulge
Sarah sent me this link to a JPL research scientist's analysis of the now-infamous "bulge" in the President's jacket during this year's first presidential debate. Convincing (there's no way in hell that line's just a "wrinkle in the shirt") -- but I'm still skeptical, because who goes to the trouble of wearing a wire in a debate and then answers questions like Dustin Hoffman in RAIN MAN? I'll have calamari and an extra pillow, please
You saw it first on "Sex and the City," (OK, maybe you gents didn't, but the ladies did!!) and now the trend is invading NYC. BEDS in RESTAURANTS! Like a giant eating slumber party!! Sounds dangerous for notorious food spillers such as myself. (The owners keep us in mind--"'We have to be careful about heavy pastas with a lot of sauce, and we're very cautious about onions and garlic in our food, spaghetti and things that can really drip and spill,' said Belkin, who added most of the food is pre-cut.") Order up!
10.28.2004
We Have Always Been At War With Eastasia
"Edwards seized on comments former New York City Mayor Rudy Guiliani made on NBC's "Today" show Thursday in which he said the troops in Iraq, not the president, bore the responsibility for searching for the explosives.
"No matter how you try to blame it on the president, the actual responsibility for it really would be for the troops that were there. Did they search carefully enough — didn't they search carefully enough?" Guiliani said on "Today." ### ...so I guess we'll be seeing the President on the news tonight publicly discouraging Guiliani from "denigrating the action of our troops and commanders in the field without knowing the facts," yes? Homecoming
10.27.2004
BLOGOSPHERE, The Next Generation
Holy shit, Wil Wheaton has a blog!! Usually I'm pretty averse to the "star blogs" (save Zach Braff's because I loooooooove him), Wil's is actually kinda funny.
Follow Up
From yesterday's post. A piece in today's NYT notes that there is a large number of "wild card" voters (i.e., new voters who have registered but who aren't really interested in following politics, don't have firm political views, and may or may not show up at the polls) could have a significant impact on the vote next week. But the million dollar question is will they show up? As a sample, the NYT "looked up" a few of these new registered voters:
A visit to a Columbus neighborhood where Democratic groups registered voters this year shows the challenge the Kerry campaign faces. Of the six new registrants listed on county records on a single block, three had recently moved, one could not be found and one was listed at a nonexistent address.Hm. This sounds like a problem to me, and not because of the wild card factor, but because of the large number of registration challenges floating around. Are Republicans wasting their time challenging voters who probably aren't going to show up at the polls at all? Also, today a nice long piece on your Sec. of State in today's WaPo. 10.26.2004
Ohio, Ohio, Ohio...
What the hell is going on back home in Ohio?? Is the national news overstating the problem here? I can only hope so, but 25,000 pending challenges sounds, well, ominous. How exactly are folks selecting voters to challenge? The most disturbing outcome, however, is raised by the NYT:
One of the gravest dangers is that partisan teams will challenge many, if not all, voters in selected precincts, with the goal of slowing voting to a standstill. In Ohio, every challenge will require a deliberation over whether the person in question should be allowed to vote. In presidential elections, lines in urban polling places are often hours long under normal conditions. If the challengers can add 10 minutes per voter, waiting times may become so long that thousands of voters will simply give up.Knowing how slow the voting process already is in a state that still uses the terribly slow punchcard ballots in most locations, such challenges--especially in neighborhoods with a high concentration of hourly workers who already have to go out of their way to clear a chunk of time to vote--truly could keep voters away from the polls. And that's bad news on BOTH sides. 10.25.2004
Rating the Talking Heads
A critic from the Dallas Morning News takes a stab at naming the most influential pundits in this year's election. Interesting to see several comedians who've made their way onto this list (not surprisingly, Jon Stewart is this guy's number one pick). Anyone else who should be on this list?? I'd be curious to see who would show up if they expanded beyond TV to include new media--especially bloggers. Personally, I think his Drudge reference is questionable; Drudge has lost ground in his significance in the blogosphere over the last couple of years.
(via The Poor Man.) Cuckoo
Douglas County authorities say they can't explain why Beverly Valentine, 54, broke into an empty home and started acting like it was her own.
During the 21/2 weeks the owner, Beverly Mitchell, was on vacation in Greece, Valentine allegedly redecorated the ranch home, ripping up carpet and taking down the owner's pictures and replacing them with her own. ...The case came to light when Mitchell, who lived alone, returned home October 4 to find the lights on and a strange car parked in the driveway. Mitchell called police, who went in and found Valentine, who at first pretended she was renting the home. 10.22.2004
Which biological molecule are you?
Because I looooooove stoopid quizzes... Which Biological Molecule Are You? I'm glucose:You are glucose. People feed off of you. You are sweet, caring, and a source of energy for everyone around you. You can inspire others with your creativity and depth, and you can keep people alive when in times of famine. People love you...or at least the way you taste.Awwwww. Sweet as sugar, that's me through and through. Tales from the Left Coast
If you haven't already, check out Richard Rushfield's column from today's Slate. As a social experiment, Rushfield donned campaign gear and then infiltrated communities thick with the opposition. His experiences wearing Kerry regalia are tame, limited to a few irritated glances and a stalking incident that can't quite be connected to the shirt. Venturing out into LA-LA-Liberal land wearing Bush gear, however, is quite a different story:
I sit down to eat. Dining nearby is a young girl who looks to be about 6-years-old; she gazes at my shirt with a look so forlorn, I expect to learn that Dick Cheney just stole her crayons. Her mother arrives and gives her a hug of consolation. The girl starts to talk, but I can only make out "Bush shirt," which she says to her mother as she points my way. The mother turns and glares, shaking her head at me. I start to wonder what sort of person I am to inflict this on a poor child.And I thought people only behaved this partisanly in Washington. 10.21.2004
Go Sawx!
From ESPN.
NEW YORK -- In hindsight, perhaps it was a mistake for the Yankees to raise a "Mission Accomplished" banner above their dugout after Game 3.Yeah. Probably not a great move. Not that I'm a huge Boston fan so much as an anti-Yankees fan (or maybe it's just that I like rooting for the underdog). But I'm psyched the Red Sox will be in this year's Series. A Bend In the Space-Time Continuum
So, yeah, Einstein was right:
See also SPACE.com's story about how scientists have used satellites to measure local gravity and its variances (!) over time. ![]() "Toldja." 10.20.2004
Diarrhea of the Mouth
Chris Suellentrop on why John Kerry insists on turning something as simple as See Spot Run into Ulysses.
So, basically, our choice this year is between two grammar-challenged candidates (one doesn't put enough words together and fails to form clear sentences, the other puts too many words together and fails to form clear sentences.) Whee. Mixing For Halloween
Holy cow: check out this massive, double-disc Halloween mix, available for free download (including the artwork for the sleeve)!
Half of this stuff, I have no idea of what it even is, but how awesome is that? [via boingboing] 10.19.2004
Life's a Circus
Circus Peanut, that is. I discovered today that my boss shares with Val and cousin Laura a love for (obsession with?) the Circus Peanut. In fact, she shared with me a recipe for Circus Peanut Jell-O Salad. Circus Peanut Jello SaladLong live the Circus Peanut, whatever form it may take. Just don't make me eat 'em. 10.18.2004
Jon puts the smack down
Have you seen Jon Stewart's performance on Crossfire yet? If not, watch it. I think the funniest part is Paul Begala trying (lamely) a few times to simply "change the subject."
10.17.2004
Eastman Kodak I Ain't
10.14.2004
This oughta be interesting
Chris Rock will be the host of the next Oscar's show.
I predict one of two things will happen: 1) He hosts and is so completely over the top that he manages to offend just about everyone, including the network censors; or 2) They so muzzle his quite controversial humor that he falls flat on his face. I don't know which option is better. Terrorizing our schools
Since I do PR for an education-related organization, I'm always reading the latest education headlines. One of my daily reads is eduwonk , a Washington-type with an affinity for education policy news. So he got my attention with a post today about Chechen terrorists who may have made their way into the U.S.
What's most disturbing to me, as the article points out, is the recent edict by the Education Department for ALL SCHOOLS--not just those in "high-risk" cities--to look into security measures around the school. I actually hadn't heard anything about this until last weekend, when I was in Ohio with my college girlfriends, one of whom is a fifth-grade teacher. She said all the staff at her school had received an e-mail telling them that there had been recent attempts at some schools to get detailed plans for schools, such as bus routes and building schematics. This is in a small school outside Cincinnati, Ohio. Could terrorists be targeting our schools next? Eduwonk, who seems to be a well-connected guy, also posts a comment from a security expert friend, who points out that many of our schools actually have policies in place that could be more dangerous in a terrorism situation: "My concern with the schools is that, in our area at least, in the event of any so-called "code blue" emergency--terrorist, biohazard, chemical release, severe weather, all the schools would go into "lock-down." and prevent any children from leaving school even if their parents come to claim them. There are not enough police to protect every school. Clever terrorists could create a code-blue diversion by releasing suspect smoke/gas, for instance, or by making a threat, solely in order to precipitate the lockdown. The terrorists would then have their choice, just in this [the Washington, D.C.] area of 300 unprotected schools, none of which were designed with safe havens or even the most basic security features. If they chose wisely they could find among their hostages the children and spouses of movers and shakers in the government."Chilling. On the other hand, is our intelligence community doing enough to make sure that we're truly only raising the alarm where necessary? Asking school staff and administration to carefully review security policy is one thing, and I'm all for the Dept. of Ed. offering suggestions for effective security management. But issuing unspecific "terror warnings" to schools? i.e., "something bad might happen, it could be something like this, but we really don't know, so everyone just keep your eyes open, hey?" Looks like the Dept. of Ed. has taken a page from the Homeland Security Handbook. Regardless, the Chechens have proved they don't mess around, so I hope all you family and friends who work in schools are keeping your eyes and ears open. 10.12.2004
Godspeed
A true story:
Val, Carl and I, at the Lennox, on the sidewalk going from Staples to Old Navy for a new flannel shirt for Carl (tomorrow being Fall Picture Day, we definitely thought a flannel shirt and his bib overalls would look pretty snazzy.) I'm pushing Carl in the stroller, Val to my left. Up ahead of us is a couple, man and woman, older and middle-aged. The woman, in a purple/lavender sweater, is talking, somewhat excitedly, as if she's thrilled to be alive; the man, quiet, smiling, grey blazer and black pants, making his way up the street. They are walking toward us. They are taking up the sidewalk; the woman either isn't watching me or doesn't see the stroller, but all but refuses to yield until the last moment, forces me over to the side and into one of the planting beds lining the walkway. They pass us by, a smile and nod, as she continues yammering on about whatever it is she's talking about. We walk on a little further towards the Old Navy, my eyes bugging out, fingers clutching the handle of the stroller in a white-knuckled frenzy. Val, who had to fall into step behind me, catches back up, sees me and breathes, "I didn't think she was ever going to move over." "Who cares?" says I. "That just made my entire night." "What are you talking about?" Val asks. "You didn't recognize that guy she was talking to?" "No." "First man to orbit the earth."
Ears still ringing!
All gloating aside (OK, maybe a little gloating), last night's Vote for Change concert--though lengthy--was worth every precious penny.
We kicked off the night in a serious seat upgrade, thanks to one of my cohorts with friends in high places. Instead of nosebleed row, we scored seats in the 100 level, left stage. We were in the last row right in front of a suite that was home to Washington's favorite news man, Tim Russert. Apparently Tim likes Bruce, too. We also managed to snag a top-secret, high-security set list, so we knew beforehand who was going on when and singning what. If you didn't get to see the show on the Sundance channel, there's a pretty good review on Entertainment Weekly. My own personal impressions of the show: Personally, I was completely blown away by both REM and Bruce Springsteen. Never having seen either in concert, both performed their sets with boundless energy that drew the entire crowd (remember, this is a stodgy Washington crowd) to their feet. I especially enjoyed watching Michael Stipe, who really and truly seems like a crazy person on stage. He strutted on in this white suit that made him look ganglier than usual, and dancing around the stage spastically, I thought he looked more like Elastic Man. I wasn't wowed by the REM/Springsteen version of "Man on the Moon," mostly because Springsteen's style just didn't seem to fit the song. But Stipe fronting the E street for "Because the Night" was awesome and seemed like they've always played together.
The other hugely awesome pairing--Springsteen brought out John Fogarty and they churned out the most intense version of CCR's "Fortunate Son" I've ever heard. Pearl Jam was a huge disappointment. Our program listed only one song they planned to sing, "Better Man," which happens to be my all-time favorite PJ number. They blew it off, though, playing four songs I'd never even heard of. Their set was so lame that the entire crowd sat down during their entire performance. Only a duet with Tim Robbins brought folks to their feet, and even that was short-lived. Robbins, by the way, looked so out of place on the stage. He was like a scarecrow in a pumpkin patch, towering over Vedder and the other Jammers, moving uncomfortably with the music. I didn't even know he could sing, but apparently he and Vedder go way back, and Robbins even has his own band, Gob Roberts. Think I'll skip that one. Other snoozers--Who the heck are Jurassic Five? Never heard of them. Didn't recognize their songs, either. Was also completely bored by Bonnie Raitt/Keb' Mo'/Jackson Browne set. Other highlights from the the night--the Dixie Chicks with James Taylor singing "Sweet Baby James" were phenomenal. DMB was in typical good form, though they were the most anti-social of the bunch, not bringing on any "special guests" to sing with them. I would have liked to have seen their band jam with one of the other big headliners. John Mellencamp was impressive if low-key (and does anyone know why he looks like an old, withered Mark Wahlberg these days??). And, of course, the finale (which had a very "We are the World" kind of feel to it) was punctuated by Stipe's stripping off of his Jacket to reveal a Kerry t-shirt. He spent the rest of the show not singing, but running around the stage, tugging on his shirt to show it off to the cheering crowd. If only all concerts were so fun. 10.11.2004
Rewind
Looks like I get to do a lot of catching up -- and following up -- this evening, post-flu.
Earlier Item #1: "Karen Ryan" Via Josh Marshall, the Department of Education apparently forgot what the Department of Health and Human Services got in trouble for earlier this year (P.S. -- it's "news videos" like this, featuring the same damn "reporter".)Earlier Item #2: "Sinclair Broadcasting" Apparently not content with labeling Ted Koppel as a supporter of Iraqi insurgents and terrorists, the broadcasting group (which owns both the ABC and Fox affiliates here in Columbus) is voluntarily airing an hour-long Swift Boat Veterans for Truth commercial (cleverly disquised as a "documentary") in prime-time. Do you suppose they have to announce "the SwiftVets are responsible for the content of this hour-long polemic" at the end of the show, in the place of "this SwiftVets program was produced before a live studio audience"?Finally, my dear, loving, sweet sister left me a loud voice mail this evening while she was at the full Concert for Change in DC (Springsteen, REM, Dave Matthews, Pearl Jam, pretty much everyone else I would love to see live in one place). She was gloating. Nice to see you, too, world. 10.07.2004
Neutron Man
Veeps!
Hindsight
![]() Parenting Tip #83(a): if your child vomits up the entire contents of the bottle you just gave him five minutes ago, it is probably not a good idea to then sit him down shortly thereafter and attempt to feed him a full dinner of peas, chicken, and bananas. Parenting Tip #83(b): if your child vomits once on your clothes, and you then feed him peas, chicken, and bananas, you would be foolish to have changed into a white t-shirt. Twice. 10.05.2004
You Think I'm Dead, But I Sail Away
I was all set to write up what was sure to be a glowing review of the Pixies show at Vet's last night. I was SO SURE they would BRING THE ROCK and that everything would be AWESOME.
Well, no. The Good: the band sounded great -- it was a great retrospective of Your Favorite Pixies Tunes, a little something for everyone. Best moments: the Neil Young "Winterlong" cover, Joey Santiago playing guitar with one of Lovering's drumsticks during "Nimrod", Kim Deal rocking out on "Gigantic", Frank screaming his freaking head off in "Dead" (and then the stage lights rotating up into the audience on "Caribou" like FRIGGIN' EYES while Frank's still screaming), the unadulterated awesomeness that was "Planet of Sound"... There was plenty for even a johnny-come-lately like myself. (EDIT: Upon reflection, the drumstick stunt was during "Vamos", and Frank wasn't so much screaming on "Dead" as he was on "Tame". Blame the newbie fan.) The Bad: Vet's. Seriously. Whoever thought putting this band in a venue staffed by the aging ushers from the Ohio Theater (nary a one under sixty, I'll wager -- great and all, but come on, ushers working what is essentially a crazy speed-metal noise cowboy punk band on a reunion tour?), with row upon row upon row of seats (thus separating the audience, physically, from the band -- how do you crowd the stage when there's a big honkin' metal thing digging into your leg?), with a concession policy that prevented you from, you know, enjoying your concession and listening to the music at the same time (no beers in the seats, don'tcha know), with a reported CUTOFF of said concessions at 9:00 (!!!), and with what, to my eyes, appeared to be a forced abbreviation of the show at the encore (ninety minutes start to finish, 8:50 to 10:20 p.m., complete with a not-so-subtle "Come see us again in Dayton!" hint from Kim)... well, whoever made that decision, they're on crack. I'm fairly confident when I report that Veteran's Memorial Auditorium was responsible for this show being just meh. (The opening band was the Thrills, and the criticisms of the band I've heard elsewhere -- "they're boring" -- well, let's just say I was not Thrilled. There also were some things the Pixies didn't play -- "Levitate Me", the full-speed version of "Wave of Mutilation", "Broken Face", the new "Bam Thwok" -- but I still think that's down to the show being cut short. It just felt so ODD. I don't know that that's what happened, it's just my unfounded speculation, but there was something OFF about the way the whole thing wrapped up.) I still enjoyed it, though -- it was worth seeing the band, even at a lousy venue. For those wondering how cool the show itself looked, xtop's got some pictures of the KC show last week. Hey, are you gonna eat that?!
You heard it here first... The legendary 5-second rule that applies to food droppers everywhere is actually, well, somewhat legit.
Eat away with confidence, my friends. Via Planet Dan. 10.04.2004
Billy Joel goes J. Crew
J. Crew U, that is. Apparently the Piano Man's new Uptown Girl is a young lass who just finished her studies at Miami of Ohio. The reception was khakis optional.
|
|
|
||